See The 10 Trashiest Cities In New York

New York State is home to a diverse range of cities, each with its own unique characteristics. However, a list compiled by RoadSnacks, using publicly available data, identified ten cities as the “trashiest” based on various factors. These factors include annual salary, demographics, high school dropout rates, drug use, violence, residents on welfare, number of payday loan outlets, and number of dollar stores. Here’s a look at these cities with an explanation of why they might be considered as such:

1-Gloversville:

Topping the list, Gloversville has high rates of residents on welfare, high school dropouts, and a significant number of payday loans per capita​​.

2-Utica:

Ranked second, although specific data isn’t provided, the factors considered for this ranking likely include issues related to low income, high crime, or education challenges.

3-Jamestown:

Similar to Utica, Jamestown’s position on this list suggests issues in economic, educational, or social parameters.

4-Niagara Falls:

Known more for its natural beauty, the city’s inclusion might be due to economic struggles and demographic challenges.

5-Buffalo:

As a larger city, Buffalo’s ranking could be influenced by its urban challenges, including poverty and crime rates.

6-Binghamton:

This city might face issues like high unemployment or low education attainment, contributing to its rank.

7-Elmira:

Elmira’s inclusion suggests concerns in areas such as welfare dependency or drug use.

8-Ronkonkoma:

Located in Long Island, Ronkonkoma’s challenges might be related to demographic shifts or economic factors.

9-Auburn:

Auburn’s place on this list could indicate economic difficulties or social welfare concerns.

10-Cortland:

Similar to other cities on the list, Cortland might struggle with issues like low income or high crime rates.

It’s important to note that such lists are subjective and can be influenced by various biases. They often don’t capture the positive aspects and potential of these cities. The factors used to determine this ranking, such as welfare rates or number of dollar stores, offer a limited perspective and do not encompass the complete socio-economic dynamics of a city. Each of these cities has its own unique history, culture, and community strengths, which are not reflected in this kind of ranking.